Workable vs JazzHR
Which hr & recruiting tool is right for you? Compare features, pricing, and user reviews to make the best choice.
Workable
From $299
G2 4.4 · 702 reviewsSmall to mid-sized companies and growing teams that need an easy-to-use ATS to manage end-to-end recruiting (posting, sourcing, screening, interviewing, and reporting) with strong collaboration and integrations.
vs
JazzHR
From $1,000
G2 4.4 · 868 reviewsSmall to mid-sized businesses that need a straightforward ATS to centralize applicants, collaborate with hiring teams, and post jobs broadly without enterprise-level complexity.
Side by side
 Workable |  JazzHR | |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | From $299/month (billed annually) | From $1,000/year (about $83/month, billed annually) |
| G2 Rating | 4.4 (702 reviews) | 4.4 (868 reviews) |
| Best For | Small to mid-sized companies and growing teams that need an easy-to-use ATS to manage end-to-end recruiting (posting, sourcing, screening, interviewing, and reporting) with strong collaboration and integrations. | Small to mid-sized businesses that need a straightforward ATS to centralize applicants, collaborate with hiring teams, and post jobs broadly without enterprise-level complexity. |
Pros and cons
Workable
Pros
- User-friendly interface that’s quick to adopt for hiring managers and recruiters
- Strong job posting and pipeline management for structured, repeatable hiring
- Good collaboration features (scorecards, feedback, permissions) for team-based hiring
- Broad integration ecosystem (HRIS, calendars, email, background checks, assessments)
Cons
- Entry price is higher than it used to be ($299/month billed annually for small companies), and add-ons like texting, video interviews and assessments cost extra on Standard
- Some advanced customization/automation and reporting needs may require higher-tier plans
- Not always the best fit for very large enterprises needing highly complex workflows and governance
JazzHR
Pros
- Easy-to-use ATS focused on core recruiting workflows
- Good collaboration features for hiring teams (scorecards, feedback, approvals)
- Multi-job-board posting and centralized candidate pipeline
- Customizable stages and automation to standardize hiring
Cons
- Advanced HRIS features (payroll, benefits, full HR suite) are not the primary focus
- Some integrations and automation may require higher-tier plans or add-ons
- Reporting/analytics depth may be limited compared with enterprise ATS platforms
Marcus Williams