Skip to main content
HR & Recruiting

Workable vs Breezy HR

Which hr & recruiting tool is right for you? Compare features, pricing, and user reviews to make the best choice.

Workable

From $299
G2 4.4 · 702 reviews

Small to mid-sized companies and growing teams that need an easy-to-use ATS to manage end-to-end recruiting (posting, sourcing, screening, interviewing, and reporting) with strong collaboration and integrations.

Breezy HR

From $157Free plan
G2 4.4 · 683 reviews

Small to mid-sized teams that want an easy-to-use ATS to manage job postings, pipelines, and collaborative hiring without heavy enterprise complexity.

Side by side

WorkableBreezy HR
PricingFrom $299/month (billed annually)Free; paid from $157/month (billed annually)
G2 Rating4.4 (702 reviews)4.4 (683 reviews)
Best ForSmall to mid-sized companies and growing teams that need an easy-to-use ATS to manage end-to-end recruiting (posting, sourcing, screening, interviewing, and reporting) with strong collaboration and integrations.Small to mid-sized teams that want an easy-to-use ATS to manage job postings, pipelines, and collaborative hiring without heavy enterprise complexity.

Pros and cons

Workable

Pros

  • User-friendly interface that’s quick to adopt for hiring managers and recruiters
  • Strong job posting and pipeline management for structured, repeatable hiring
  • Good collaboration features (scorecards, feedback, permissions) for team-based hiring
  • Broad integration ecosystem (HRIS, calendars, email, background checks, assessments)

Cons

  • Entry price is higher than it used to be ($299/month billed annually for small companies), and add-ons like texting, video interviews and assessments cost extra on Standard
  • Some advanced customization/automation and reporting needs may require higher-tier plans
  • Not always the best fit for very large enterprises needing highly complex workflows and governance

Breezy HR

Pros

  • Clean, intuitive pipeline UI that’s easy for hiring teams to adopt
  • Strong collaboration tools (notes, @mentions, scorecards) for structured hiring
  • Good candidate communication and scheduling workflow support
  • Free plan available for very small teams or light hiring needs

Cons

  • Paid plans can get expensive as hiring needs grow (Startup is $157/month billed annually, $189 monthly)
  • Some advanced features (automation, integrations, reporting) may be plan-dependent
  • Not a full HRIS—primarily focused on recruiting/ATS rather than end-to-end HR

Related comparisons

Explore other categories