Lever vs Workable
Which hr & recruiting tool is right for you? Compare features, pricing, and user reviews to make the best choice.
Lever
From Custom
G2 4.3 · 2,094 reviewsMid-market to enterprise teams that want an ATS combined with CRM-style sourcing and nurturing, and that run collaborative, structured interview processes across multiple stakeholders.
vs
Workable
From $299
G2 4.4 · 702 reviewsSmall to mid-sized companies and growing teams that need an easy-to-use ATS to manage end-to-end recruiting (posting, sourcing, screening, interviewing, and reporting) with strong collaboration and integrations.
Side by side
 Lever |  Workable | |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Custom quote | From $299/month (billed annually) |
| G2 Rating | 4.3 (2,094 reviews) | 4.4 (702 reviews) |
| Best For | Mid-market to enterprise teams that want an ATS combined with CRM-style sourcing and nurturing, and that run collaborative, structured interview processes across multiple stakeholders. | Small to mid-sized companies and growing teams that need an easy-to-use ATS to manage end-to-end recruiting (posting, sourcing, screening, interviewing, and reporting) with strong collaboration and integrations. |
Pros and cons
Lever
Pros
- Strong ATS + CRM combination for managing both active applicants and long-term talent pools
- Collaboration and structured interviewing tools help standardize evaluation and reduce bias
- Flexible workflows and pipeline configuration for different roles and departments
- Robust integrations ecosystem (HRIS, background checks, scheduling, email/calendar, etc.)
Cons
- No transparent public pricing; requires sales engagement and can be costly for smaller teams
- Implementation and workflow customization may require admin time and change management
- Advanced reporting and customization needs may depend on plan level and add-ons
Workable
Pros
- User-friendly interface that’s quick to adopt for hiring managers and recruiters
- Strong job posting and pipeline management for structured, repeatable hiring
- Good collaboration features (scorecards, feedback, permissions) for team-based hiring
- Broad integration ecosystem (HRIS, calendars, email, background checks, assessments)
Cons
- Entry price is higher than it used to be ($299/month billed annually for small companies), and add-ons like texting, video interviews and assessments cost extra on Standard
- Some advanced customization/automation and reporting needs may require higher-tier plans
- Not always the best fit for very large enterprises needing highly complex workflows and governance
Marcus Williams