Skip to main content
Design & Creative

InVision vs Axure RP

Which design & creative tool is right for you? Compare features, pricing, and user reviews to make the best choice.

I

InVision

4.12,500 reviews

Product design teams and agencies that need clickable prototypes and a centralized place to collect stakeholder feedback and coordinate design-to-development handoff.

Starting at $7.95/user/month
A

Axure RP

4.2600 reviews

UX/UI designers and product teams who need high-fidelity, logic-driven prototypes for complex web and enterprise applications, plus documentation and stakeholder review workflows.

Starting at $29/user/month

Side-by-Side Comparison

FeatureInVisionAxure RP
Pricing$7.95/user/month$29/user/month
G2 Rating4.1 (2,500 reviews)4.2 (600 reviews)
Capterra Rating4.64.5
Best ForProduct design teams and agencies that need clickable prototypes and a centralized place to collect stakeholder feedback and coordinate design-to-development handoff.UX/UI designers and product teams who need high-fidelity, logic-driven prototypes for complex web and enterprise applications, plus documentation and stakeholder review workflows.

Pros & Cons

InVision

Pros

  • + Fast way to turn static screens into shareable interactive prototypes
  • + Simple stakeholder review flow with commenting and notifications
  • + Useful handoff/inspect capabilities for developers
  • + Broad ecosystem of integrations for product teams

Cons

  • Feature set and performance can feel dated compared with newer all-in-one design platforms
  • Collaboration and file management can be less seamless for large, complex projects
  • Some advanced capabilities and enterprise controls require higher-tier plans or custom pricing

Axure RP

Pros

  • + Powerful interactions and logic beyond typical click-through prototypes
  • + Strong for complex flows, enterprise UX, and detailed UX documentation
  • + Robust component reuse (masters) and scalable file organization
  • + Easy stakeholder sharing and commenting through Axure Cloud

Cons

  • Steeper learning curve than lighter-weight prototyping tools
  • Desktop app workflow can feel heavier/less fluid for quick ideation
  • Collaboration/versioning can be less seamless than fully cloud-native design suites