Figma vs Adobe XD vs Sketch vs InVision vs Axure RP - 2025 Honest Review & Comparison

Why Finding the Right Design & Creative Tool Matters in 2025

2025 is the year design tools stopped being “just for design.”

They’re product decision engines now. They’re stakeholder therapy. They’re the place where marketing wants “just a quick landing page,” engineering wants “something shippable,” and leadership wants “a prototype by Friday” (which… sure, no pressure).

I’ve spent the last couple months bouncing between Figma, Adobe XD, Sketch, InVision, Axure RP, and Framer—setting up test projects, importing the same UI kit, rebuilding the same flows, and doing that classic “can I actually ship this, or is it a pretty demo?” sanity check. And yeah… I got annoyed. A lot. Because every tool claims it’s the one-stop shop. But in real life, your team is messy. Your process is messier. Your file naming? We don’t talk about that.

Here’s what changed in 2025: collaboration isn’t optional, prototyping expectations are higher, and the gap between “design” and “production” keeps shrinking. Some tools are clearly leaning into multiplayer workflows. Others are doubling down on high-fidelity interactions. And a few are basically saying, “Forget handoff—publish the thing.”

Choosing wrong doesn’t just cost money. It costs momentum. It makes your designers feel like they’re pushing a shopping cart with a wobbly wheel—technically moving, but loudly miserable the whole time.

So this isn’t a polite roundup. It’s a real comparison, with opinions… and a few “actually, let me walk that back…” moments too.

---

Quick Verdict: The TL;DR

• Best overall: Figma — the most complete “design + collaboration + systems” package for modern teams (even when it drives you a little nuts).
• Best for small teams / solo designers: Sketch (Mac-only caveat) — fast, mature, and still weirdly satisfying for pure UI work.
• Best value (if you need to publish): Framer — design-to-live is the point, and it’s surprisingly affordable for what it does.
• Best for enterprises & complex UX: Axure RP — conditional logic prototyping that makes other tools feel like paper puppets.
• Best if you’re deep in Adobe already: Adobe XD — tight Creative Cloud integration… but the market has moved, and it shows.

---

Master Comparison Table

Ratings cited from G2 as provided; you can cross-check with Capterra for another perspective, but G2’s review volumes here are useful directional signals.

---

Figma - Full Review (350-400 words)

Figma is the crowded coffee shop of design tools. Loud. Alive. Everyone’s in there. And somehow… work gets done.

In 2025, Figma’s biggest strength is still the thing that made it famous: real-time collaboration that doesn’t feel like a bolted-on feature. It’s not “file sharing.” It’s multiplayer design. When I was setting this up for a cross-functional sprint—PM, designer, researcher, and one brave engineer—the speed of “jump in, point at it, change it” was the difference between alignment and another meeting that should’ve been an email.

Key features

• Component-driven design systems (variants, auto layout, tokens/workflows depending on your setup)
• Prototyping that’s good enough for most product work
• Comments, versioning, and review flows that feel native
• Strong ecosystem around handoff and collaboration

Pricing

Figma’s pricing depends on role and plan, and it’s changed over time—so I won’t pretend a single number fits every team. The point is: it’s usually not the cheapest, but it often replaces multiple tools.

Pros

• Best-in-class collaboration—you’ll actually use it
• Design systems scale well (especially for product orgs)
• Cross-platform (no “sorry, I’m on Windows” drama)
• Huge community, templates, plugins
• Great for bringing stakeholders into the process (without giving them scissors)

Cons

• Can get messy fast—files become junk drawers if you don’t enforce structure
• Prototyping is solid, but not “Axure-level” logic
• Performance can wobble on massive files (honestly, this surprised me the first time)
• Governance can be painful without clear conventions

Who should use it / avoid it

Use Figma if you’re a team—or even a solo designer who collaborates a lot with PMs and devs. Avoid it if your work depends on deep conditional prototyping or you want a calmer, simpler “just me and my pixels” environment. Figma can feel like a party when you wanted a library.

---

Adobe XD - Full Review (300-350 words)

Adobe XD is like that reliable appliance you bought years ago. It still runs. It still makes toast. But you walk into a friend’s kitchen and suddenly yours feels… dated.

Let me be fair: XD can still handle UI design and prototyping, and it’s especially compelling if your org is already paying for Adobe Creative Cloud. That “single-app” pricing makes procurement easier, and the Creative Cloud integration is genuinely convenient when you’re bouncing between Photoshop, Illustrator, and other Adobe tools.

Features & positioning

• UI design with components and repeat grids
• Prototyping with transitions and interactions
• Integration advantages if you’re Adobe-standardized

Pricing & rating

• $9.99/user/month (Adobe Creative Cloud single-app)
• G2: 4.3★ with 1800 reviews (per provided competitor data)

Pros

• Best fit for Adobe-heavy teams—assets move smoothly through the ecosystem
• Familiar UI for designers already living in Adobe land
• Capable core prototyping for straightforward flows
• Easy to justify internally if procurement already trusts Adobe

Cons

• The broader market momentum is elsewhere—updates and ecosystem feel less central now
• Collaboration and “multiplayer” workflows don’t feel as native as Figma
• Plugin and community energy isn’t what it used to be

Best use cases

XD makes the most sense when you’ve got:

• A team that already uses Creative Cloud daily
• A need for basic-to-medium prototypes
• A desire to keep tooling consolidated under Adobe contracts

If you’re starting fresh in 2025, though… I’ll be blunt: you’ll probably trial it, then drift toward Figma or Framer unless there’s a strong internal reason not to. And yes, that’s a little sad—because XD isn’t bad. It’s just not the center of the conversation anymore.

---

Sketch - Full Review (300-350 words)

Sketch is the quiet workshop that still builds beautiful furniture. It’s not trying to be a nightclub. It’s not trying to be a full-stack product platform. It just wants you to design great interfaces—fast.

And it’s still really good at that.

Sketch remains Mac-native, and you feel it in the performance and the UI. Things snap. The app feels “tight.” When I was rebuilding a design system library in Sketch after months in Figma, I had this moment of… relief? Like switching from a crowded open office to a door you can close.

Features

• Strong vector editing and layout tools
• Mature symbols/components and library workflows
• Huge plugin ecosystem (still one of its superpowers)

Pricing & rating

• $10/user/month (billed annually)
• G2: 4.4★ with 1400 reviews (per provided data)

Pros

• Fast, polished, Mac-native experience
• Excellent for design system maintenance and UI production
• Plugin ecosystem gives it longevity and flexibility
• Feels focused—less “everything everywhere all at once”

Cons

• Mac-only is a real constraint (and yes, it causes team politics)
• Collaboration can feel less effortless than Figma’s multiplayer model
• If your org wants a single shared source of truth accessible to everyone, Sketch can require more setup and discipline

Best use cases

Sketch is ideal for:

• Small-to-mid teams that are all-in on Mac
• Designers who prioritize speed and craft in UI production
• Teams with a strong design system and a plugin-driven workflow

If you’re deeply collaborative with non-designers day-to-day, Figma still wins. But if you’re a design team that wants control, focus, and a tool that stays out of your way… Sketch can feel like coming home. (Actually, let me walk that back—“home” if your home is Apple-only.)

---

InVision - Full Review (300-350 words)

InVision is the tool a lot of teams used to rally around for prototyping and feedback. And it still shows up in orgs like an old conference badge you keep finding in drawers.

Its reputation is built on stakeholder review workflows—commenting, approvals, sharing prototypes, keeping conversations attached to screens. For distributed teams, that mattered. A lot. When I was running remote reviews across time zones, having one place for feedback felt like putting labels on everything in the fridge. Suddenly you’re not arguing about what’s whose.

Features

• Prototype sharing and presentation
• Commenting and feedback threads
• Stakeholder-friendly review flows

Pricing & rating

• $7.95/user/month (starting paid plan)
• G2: 4.1★ with 2500 reviews (per provided data)

Pros

• Strong for feedback and approvals—especially with non-design stakeholders
• Easy to share and get reactions without teaching someone a full design tool
• Recognizable brand in many orgs (reduces adoption friction)

Cons

• Many teams now get similar review workflows directly in Figma (or other platforms)
• Can feel like “one more tool” in the stack rather than the hub
• If your prototypes need advanced interactions, it may not be enough on its own

Best use cases

InVision fits when:

• Your biggest pain is stakeholder feedback chaos
• You need a lightweight way to present prototypes
• Your org already has InVision embedded in process (and change management is… not fun)

But if you’re starting from zero in 2025, you’ll probably ask: “Why not just do this where the designs already live?” And that question is hard to ignore. InVision can still be useful—just not always necessary.

---

Axure RP - Full Review (300-350 words)

Axure RP is the power tool in the garage. It’s not pretty. It’s not trying to impress anyone on Dribbble. But if you need to build a prototype that behaves like a real application—logic, conditions, dynamic panels, the whole deal—Axure is the one you reach for.

This is where a lot of design tools tap out. They’ll give you transitions and overlays and maybe some fancy scrolling. Axure gives you behavior. When I was setting up a complex enterprise workflow (permissions, edge cases, “if this then that”), Axure was the first time the prototype stopped being a slideshow and started being a simulation.

Features

• Conditional logic (“if/else”) interactions
• Dynamic panels, variables, complex states
• Documentation-oriented workflows for enterprise UX

Pricing & rating

• $29/user/month (Pro)
• G2: 4.2★ with 600 reviews (per provided data)

Pros

• Unmatched interaction depth for UX prototyping
• Great for enterprise apps and complex flows
• Lets teams validate logic before engineering invests heavily
• Can reduce ambiguity in requirements (which saves real money)

Cons

• Learning curve is real—like “weekend project becomes a month” real
• UI and workflow can feel heavy compared to modern design-first tools
• Collaboration isn’t as frictionless as Figma’s real-time model

Best use cases

Axure is best when:

• You’re designing complex systems (enterprise, dashboards, internal tools)
• You need to test logic, not just layout
• Your stakeholders need to feel the workflow, not imagine it

If you’re mostly designing marketing pages or simple product flows, Axure is probably overkill. But if you’ve ever heard, “Wait—what happens if the user does this?” and your prototype can’t answer… Axure starts looking very attractive.

---

Framer - Full Review (300-350 words)

Framer is what happens when prototyping gets tired of pretending and decides to become the real thing.

In 2025, Framer’s pitch is simple: design high-fidelity experiences and publish them—without dragging your dev team into a “quick” microsite request that somehow turns into a sprint. It’s a bridge between design and live web output, and when it clicks, it feels like cheating.

When I was trying to spin up a landing page with real interactions—hover states, scroll behavior, responsive tweaks—Framer was the first tool where the “prototype” didn’t die in a handoff doc. We just shipped it. That’s a different kind of satisfaction.

Features

• High-fidelity interactions and animation
• Responsive web layout mindset
• Built-in publishing workflow (the big differentiator)

Pricing & rating

• $5/month (starting site plan)
• G2: 4.6★ with 300 reviews (per provided data)

Pros

• Design-to-live publishing is the killer feature
• Great for marketing sites, product pages, and interactive prototypes
• Strong interaction fidelity—feels closer to the browser than most tools
• Pricing can be extremely compelling for small site needs

Cons

• If you just need UI mockups and handoff, it can feel like bringing a food truck to make a sandwich
• Teams may need to adjust workflow and ownership (designers “shipping” can trigger internal debates)
• Not the tool for deeply complex enterprise logic the way Axure is

Best use cases

Framer is best for:

• Teams that want to publish (not just prototype)
• Marketing + product teams building real web experiences fast
• Designers who enjoy interaction detail and responsiveness

If your organization is strict about engineering owning all production output, Framer can create friction. But if your bottleneck is “we can’t ship small web updates fast enough,” Framer is a release valve. A very shiny one.

---

Head-to-Head Comparison (300-400 words)

Let’s compare these the way teams actually feel them—day to day, under deadline, with someone in Slack asking “is it ready yet?”

Ease of use

• Sketch feels the most “pure” for UI work—if you’re on Mac.
• Figma is easy to start, but the collaboration power also creates clutter fast… like a shared kitchen where nobody does dishes.
• Framer is approachable, but you’ll think in “web” sooner than you expect.
• Axure is the hardest to learn. It’s not trying to be easy—it’s trying to be capable.

Features & prototyping depth

• Axure wins for complex interactions and conditional logic. No contest.
• Framer wins for “this feels real on the web” fidelity and motion.
• Figma is the most balanced: strong design systems, solid prototyping, and best collaboration.
• InVision is more about review workflows than building complex interactive logic.
• Adobe XD and Sketch cover mainstream UI/prototyping well, but they don’t dominate the “future of workflow” conversation right now.

Pricing value

• Framer looks like a steal at $5/month (G2 4.6★), especially if it replaces the “design → dev → publish” loop.
• InVision is relatively affordable at $7.95/user/month, but only worth it if it’s truly central to your feedback process.
• Sketch and Adobe XD are similar-ish around $10/user/month, with XD’s value tied heavily to Creative Cloud.
• Axure is expensive ($29/user/month)—but can pay for itself if it prevents one misunderstood enterprise build.

Integrations & ecosystem

• Figma has the broadest modern ecosystem and community momentum.
• Sketch still has a plugin culture that’s hard to beat.
• Adobe XD integrates best with Adobe’s world (obviously).
• InVision is strongest where review and approvals are the “integration.”
• Framer integrates with the web by being… the web output.

Learning curve

Lowest to highest (roughly): Sketch / Figma → Adobe XD → InVision → Framer → Axure.

---

How to Choose: Decision Framework (200-300 words)

Pick the tool the way you’d pick a car. Not by the paint color—by what your week actually looks like.

Here are the questions I’d ask your team (and yes, you should ask them out loud, in a meeting, with someone taking notes):

1. Do we need real-time collaboration daily?
   If yes, Figma becomes the default candidate. If no, Sketch becomes more appealing.

2. Are we prototyping behavior or just flow?
   If you need conditional logic, states, edge cases—Axure should be in the trial. Otherwise, you’re paying with frustration later.

3. Do we want to publish web experiences without engineering?
   If yes, Framer is the most direct path. If that idea causes internal panic, note that—because the tool won’t fix governance.

4. Are we already standardized on Adobe?
   If Creative Cloud is mandatory and design assets live there, Adobe XD may still be the path of least resistance.

5. Is stakeholder feedback the main bottleneck?
   If feedback loops are chaotic, InVision can help—but test whether your existing design tool already solves this.

Red flags during trials

• Your team spends more time organizing files than designing.
• Prototypes require “imagination” to understand (stakeholders misread them).
• Handoff creates rework because devs don’t trust the source of truth.
• Only one person on the team can use the tool well (hello, single point of failure).

Test with a real project. Not a demo file. A real one—with real pressure.

---

The Verdict: Final Recommendations (400-500 words)

Alright. If you want one “winner,” you’re going to hate this answer, because the real winner depends on what you’re building and how your team behaves when deadlines get close.

But we can still rank them—practically.

1) Figma — Best overall for product teams

Figma is the default for a reason. It’s where design, feedback, and systems work converge. If your team collaborates across disciplines—and basically every team does in 2025—Figma removes friction you didn’t even realize you were paying every day.

Action items:

• Set file conventions early (seriously… do it now, not later).
• Invest in a design system strategy, even a lightweight one.
• Run a “prototype fidelity” test: can stakeholders understand without narration?

2) Framer — Best for shipping web experiences fast

If your workflow includes marketing pages, product launches, microsites, interactive storytelling, or “we need this live yesterday,” Framer is addictive. It turns design into a publishable output, which is a huge shift. You’ll either unlock speed… or start a turf war. Plan accordingly.

Action items:

• Decide ownership: who can publish, who reviews, what’s the rollback plan?
• Test responsiveness and performance early (don’t just admire the desktop view).

3) Axure RP — Best for complex enterprise UX

Axure is the specialist. Expensive, yes. Worth it, also yes—when your prototypes need to model reality: permissions, dynamic states, complex forms, branching flows. It saves you from building the wrong thing at enterprise scale, which is the most expensive mistake.

Action items:

• Budget time for training (don’t pretend your team will “pick it up” overnight).
• Build a reusable Axure component library for common patterns.

4) Sketch — Best “focused” UI tool for Mac teams

Sketch is still an excellent choice if you’re a Mac design org that values speed, craft, and a mature plugin ecosystem. It doesn’t try to be everything, and that’s kind of the point. But you need to be honest about collaboration needs.

Action items:

• Audit plugins quarterly (plugin bloat is real).
• Define how non-design stakeholders review work.

5) Adobe XD — Best when Adobe integration is the deciding factor

If your organization is deeply standardized on Adobe, XD can still be a reasonable choice—especially for teams that don’t want to add another vendor. But if you’re expecting it to be the center of a modern collaborative workflow, you may feel boxed in.

Action items:

• Run a side-by-side pilot with Figma for collaboration and review.
• Validate the long-term roadmap internally (don’t assume).

6) InVision — Best for legacy review workflows (or specific feedback needs)

InVision can still help, especially in orgs where it’s already embedded. But for many teams, it’s no longer the hub—it’s the extra step. If you adopt it new in 2025, be sure you’re solving a real review/approval problem that your design tool can’t.

Action items:

• Map your feedback workflow. If it’s messy, fix process first—then tool.

---

Conclusion

In 2025, the “best design tool” is the one that reduces friction in your actual workflow—not the one with the prettiest marketing page.

If you want the safest bet: start with Figma.
If you want to publish and move faster than your backlog: try Framer.
If you need prototypes that behave like real software: Axure.

And whatever you pick—run a real pilot project, invite the skeptics, and measure rework. Because the most expensive tool isn’t the one with the highest price tag… it’s the one that makes your team redo the same work twice.

If you tell me your team size, platforms (Mac/Windows), and whether you ship web pages or product UI, I’ll narrow this to a 1–2 tool shortlist and a trial plan.