Greenhouse vs Workable
Which hr & recruiting tool is right for you? Compare features, pricing, and user reviews to make the best choice.
Greenhouse
From Custom
G2 4.4 · 4,034 reviewsMid-market to enterprise teams that want a structured, scalable hiring process with strong integrations, standardized interviewing, and robust reporting/controls.
vs
Workable
From $299
G2 4.4 · 702 reviewsSmall to mid-sized companies and growing teams that need an easy-to-use ATS to manage end-to-end recruiting (posting, sourcing, screening, interviewing, and reporting) with strong collaboration and integrations.
Side by side
 Greenhouse |  Workable | |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Custom quote | From $299/month (billed annually) |
| G2 Rating | 4.4 (4,034 reviews) | 4.4 (702 reviews) |
| Best For | Mid-market to enterprise teams that want a structured, scalable hiring process with strong integrations, standardized interviewing, and robust reporting/controls. | Small to mid-sized companies and growing teams that need an easy-to-use ATS to manage end-to-end recruiting (posting, sourcing, screening, interviewing, and reporting) with strong collaboration and integrations. |
Pros and cons
Greenhouse
Pros
- Strong structured-hiring tooling (scorecards, interview kits, consistent evaluation)
- Large integrations ecosystem and solid API for connecting HR/recruiting stack
- Configurable workflows/permissions suitable for complex orgs
- Good reporting foundations for pipeline and hiring process visibility
Cons
- Pricing is quote-based and can be expensive for smaller teams
- Configuration and ongoing admin work can be significant without a dedicated owner
- Some users report reporting/analytics and customization needs may require workarounds or add-ons
Workable
Pros
- User-friendly interface that’s quick to adopt for hiring managers and recruiters
- Strong job posting and pipeline management for structured, repeatable hiring
- Good collaboration features (scorecards, feedback, permissions) for team-based hiring
- Broad integration ecosystem (HRIS, calendars, email, background checks, assessments)
Cons
- Entry price is higher than it used to be ($299/month billed annually for small companies), and add-ons like texting, video interviews and assessments cost extra on Standard
- Some advanced customization/automation and reporting needs may require higher-tier plans
- Not always the best fit for very large enterprises needing highly complex workflows and governance
Marcus Williams